The
Public Health and Buildings ordinance of 1903 was used to control
the detail of the porgrammme of building development. The earlier
building control was taken over by the Sanitary Board. Later the
crown government discovered serious corruption in the board, with
the result that the building conrol responsiblity was transfered
to the Building Authority, which was within the Public Work Department.
|
On
1 June 1956, new legislation replaced the 1935 Building Ordinance.
Four aspects are highlighted as follows:
|
1.
The
Building Authority can refuse a building plan if a prosposed development
does not conform with adjacent buildings in terms of height, design,
type or intended use or if a proposed development has a poor relationships
to surrounding streets and traffic.
|
2.
Witthout
an Occupation Permit issued by the Building Authority, buildings
cannot be occupied.
|
3.
An appeals tribunal procedure was set up to consider appeals against
plan refusals.
|
4.
The
Plot ratio, the ratio of floor space in a building to the site area
covered by the building, was increased.
|
What
are its signficances? |
1.
The Building Authority had to consider the planning and design of
buildings during processing building plans. Under the 1956 ordinance,
she had more power to control professional contractors and building
construction.
|
2.
With an increase in plot ratio, development density was dramatically
aggravated, which led to traffic conjestion, overcrowding and overloaded
services. Also private developers could construct buildings higher
and thus create the current high-rise buildings landscape.
|
In
1959, an amendment to the Building(Administration )Regulations of
1956 introduced a new Section 16(1)(d). The Regulation granted a
mandatory power to the Building Authority of refusing building plan
if a proposed development did not conform to the draft outline zoning
plan. What is its significance?
|
Its
significance is that development control in Hong Kong had finally
come.
|